Skip to main content

Family Law Education Network

family law education network

Case summaries

Stay sharp with the latest family law case insights. This space brings together real-world examples, commentary and practical takeaways from recent decisions in the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia.

From enforcement missteps to representation pitfalls, these case updates are a quick way to reflect, review, and refine your practice — so you can avoid the mistakes others make.

Beitel & Beitel [2026] FedCFamC1F 495

The Court has declared that provisions of a financial agreement dealing with property on the breakdown of a marriage were of no force or effect where the parties reconciled and remained married until the husband’s

Read More »

Javor & Nora [2026] FedCFamC1F 458

The Court has ordered an unmarried father to contribute towards the mother’s childbirth maintenance and pregnancy-related medical expenses under s 67B of the Family Law Act, including costs associated with IVF, an egg donor and

Read More »

Bendon & Sloan [2026] FedCFamC1A 130

The Full Court has dismissed a father’s appeal against property settlement orders following the breakdown of a de facto relationship involving three children, providing important guidance on the treatment of post-separation depletion of the property

Read More »

Massey & Carmichael [2026] FedCFamC1A 139

The Court has allowed an appeal arising from property settlement proceedings following a 23-year de facto relationship involving a net asset pool of approximately $7.36 million. Although both parties had advanced a single global assessment

Read More »

Tiang & Pen [2026] FedCFamC1A 121

The Court has allowed a mother’s appeal against property settlement orders that awarded her just 10.5% of a net asset pool of approximately $3.48 million following a relatively short de facto relationship. Although the father

Read More »

Wanderley [2026] FedCFamC1A 140

The Court has refused a father leave to appeal a harmful proceedings order made under s 102QAC of the Family Law Act, following family law proceedings that had generated approximately 492 filed documents and 31

Read More »

Charis & Charis [2026] FedCFamC1A 92

The Full Court has dismissed a husband’s appeal against orders equally dividing a property pool of more than $128 million, the bulk of which consisted of his shares and options in a United States technology

Read More »

Daeira & Diamanda [2026] FedCFamC1A 98

Leave to appeal refused even though the primary judge erred in treating s 90AF as a free-ranging power without first identifying a relevant proprietary interest. The error was immaterial because a conceded tracing claim supported

Read More »

Fowles (No 3) [2026] FedCFamC1A 103

Full Court granted leave to appeal on the arguable question of whether the criminal standard of proof should apply to contravention proceedings under Part XIIIA that result in an order for imprisonment. The case turns

Read More »

Harridan & Harridan [2026] FedCFamC1A 104

In a property settlement after a 20-year marriage, the appeal court held that the trial judge wrongly assessed each category of contribution separately and then added them together, rather than weighing all contributions holistically as

Read More »

Catlin & Catlin (No 3) [2026] FedCFamC1F 351

During enforcement of family law property orders, a solicitor was referred to the South Australian Legal Profession Conduct Commissioner after helping his client arrange borrowings that breached court orders, well beyond the limit the court

Read More »

Zakariya & Rana [2026] FedCFamC1A 75​

The rise in prescriptions for medical cannabis can pose significant challenges in parenting proceedings for whilst the prescription may make it legal to consume cannabis it doesn’t negate the possible impact upon that parent’s conduct

Read More »

Theodor & Fadl [2026] FedCFamC1F 101

Although strictly speaking it is not a ‘costs jurisdiction’ Costs Orders are often made where the circumstances warrant doing so, such as where a party’s conduct has lengthened proceedings or a party has continued to

Read More »

Re: Domna & Anor [2026] FedCFamC1F 141

Adoption proceedings are not common. Blended families are very much the ‘norm’ and have been for many years but there can sometimes be compelling reasons for seeking an Order for adoption. However, even where one

Read More »

Mokhtar & Bilgin [2026] FedCFamC2F 165

Unfortunately, the penchant for appeals is not solely confined to self-represented litigants. Practitioners should not expend costs opposing technical filing arguments where the substantive impact on their client is negligible.

Read More »