Skip to main content

Family Law Education Network

Tag: Section 90AF

Daeira & Diamanda [2026] FedCFamC1A 98

Leave to appeal refused even though the primary judge erred in treating s 90AF as a free-ranging power without first identifying a relevant proprietary interest. The error was immaterial because a conceded tracing claim supported the injunctions under s 114, and the decision sets out the procedural care required for ex parte orders against non-parties.

| Read More

Daeira & Diamanda [2026] FedCFamC1A 98

Leave to appeal refused even though the primary judge erred in treating s 90AF as a free-ranging power without first identifying a relevant proprietary interest. The error was immaterial because a conceded tracing claim supported the injunctions under s 114, and the decision sets out the procedural care required for ex parte orders against non-parties.

| Read More